We will not be using parenthetical citations of modern works or lists of references. Please put all necessary information in the footnotes. We are using the same citation format used in the journal Henoch. For example...
Journal Article
H.S. Kvanvig, "Jubilees - Between Enoch and Moses: A Narrative Reading," JSJ 35 (2004), pp. 243-261 (here p. 260).
subsequent references...
Kvanvig, "Jubilees - Between Enoch and Moses," p. 261.
Book
G.W.E. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1: A Commentary on the Book of Enoch 1-36, 81-108 (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2001), pp. 50-51.
subsequent references...
Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch, p. 99.
Book Section
G.W.E. Nickelsburg, "Enochic Wisdom: An Alternative to the Mosaic Torah?," in Hesed Ve-Emet: Studies in Honor of Ernest S. Frerichs, ed. J. Magness and S. Gitin (Atlanta: Scholars, 1998), pp. 123-132 (here p. 124).
subsequent references...
Nickelsburg, "Enochic Wisdom," p. 124.
Short papers should be submitted by March 15, and long papers by April 15. In each case the end of the respective month is understandable.
Papers will be available for mutual consideration as they become available. It is hoped that authors will want to make some revisions to reflect awareness of concensus and divergence from the other papers. Any such revisions must be submitted by June 15 in order to be included in the "official" distribution of papers for discussion at the Seminar.
Following the Seminar an additional round of revisions can be made for the published volume. These will be due by September 15.
Please send your paper in two formats, if possible. A copy in Microsoft Word (.doc) or Rich Text (.rtf) format is necessary. A copy in PDF format can be helpful but is not always necessary.
Please prepare an abstract of about fifteen lines. This does not count toward the word count.
Please email the paper to Todd Hanneken and copy Gabrielle Boccaccini (gboccaccini@yahoo.com).
Please consider the June 15 deadline firm for submitting any changes, or the initial version as the case may be. If you can submit sooner it will be helpful for me to pace my work, and others who may benefit from your arguments prior to their own final revisions.
When making revisions please use the version that I sent back to you as a base. Depending on your preferences and the quantity of changes, you can make revisions in either of two ways. First, you could make a list of changes, referring to the page and line numbers of the .pdf version I sent back. Second, you could edit the .doc file I sent you and send back to me the edited version. The second method may be smoother for users of Microsoft Word, while the first method may be smoother if you have trouble opening and viewing the .doc file I sent you. I will try to accommodate any other preferences for how to go about making revisions.
Also, I am never more than a few days behind. If you sent a paper or revision that is not reflected on the website, I probably did not get your email. Please try again.
Also... Please use the most current version to make revisions. If you already sent a paper then you received back an edited version with a filename such as Lastname-1.0.doc.